"It's always awkward for a news organization to take the position that information or opinions shouldn't be shared," he says. "Also, if Fox decided to sue, they would have to explain how and in what amount they suffered financial harm from this employee's conduct; that's never easy, and it might require Fox to publicly reveal some information about its marketing, viewership and revenues that it might prefer to keep to itself."
Friday, April 13, 2012
Fox shouldn't sue over the Gawker mole —
if it knows what's best for it
Eriq Gardner, of the Hollywood Reporter, interviewed Michael Novicoff, a partner at Liner Grode Stein, who said that Fox News has more than one legitimate claim related to Gawker's payments to a Fox "mole" and subsequent leaks from behind Fox News' curtain, but that the right-wing network would be smarter to walk away from the situation.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment