Friday, September 9, 2011

Keystone XL pipeline poisoning of Ogallala Aquifer embraced by Romney, Perry, Gingrich and Santorum

Four GOP presidential candidates now support the construction of the Keystone XL tar sands oil pipeline through North America's most important fresh water aquifer. The pipeline would be an extension to the TransCanada's Keystone 1 pipeline, which has already leaked 12 times in its first year of operation. The Keystone XL pipeline will carry abrasive tar sands oil through a larger — but no thicker  — pipeline at 1400-1600 PSI at temperatures up to 160 degrees.
     Keystone XL pipeline leakage into the most pristeen large underground reservoir in the world will almost certainly be a question of when, not if. Even Nebraska's most important ecological slacker, Gov. Dave Heineman, has finally (and perhaps cynically) written a letter asking that the pipeline be rerouted. Heineman knows perfectly well that the federal government has no say in where pipelines are situated, because it has become a heated political issue in his state.
     Despite the fact that siting authority lies with the state, Heineman refuses to do anything related to rerouting except pass the buck to other politicians and political appointees.


     Here is his recent letter:
Dear President Obama and Secretary Clinton:

I am writing to you today regarding a very important issue to the State of Nebraska and to our citizens- the Keystone XL Pipeline.  I am opposed to the proposed route of this pipeline.  The Final Environmental Impact Statement compares a potential spill in the Sand Hills region to a 1979 Bemidji, Minnesota spill and concludes that “the impacts to shallow groundwater from a spill of a similar volume in the Sand Hills region would affect a limited area of the aquifer around the spill site.”   I disagree with this analysis, and I believe that the pipeline should not cross a substantial portion of the Ogallala Aquifer. 

Of the current proposed route, 254 miles of the pipeline would come through Nebraska and be situated directly over the Ogallala Aquifer.  The aquifer provides water to farmers and ranchers of Nebraska to raise livestock and grow crops.  Nebraska has 92,685 registered, active irrigation wells supplying water to over 8.5 million acres of harvested cropland and pasture. Forty-six percent of the total cropland harvested during 2007 was irrigated. Maintaining and protecting Nebraska’s water supply is very important to me and the residents of Nebraska.  This resource is the lifeblood of Nebraska’s agriculture industry. Cash receipts from farm markets contribute over $17 billion to Nebraska’s economy annually.  I am concerned that the proposed pipeline will potentially have detrimental effects on this valuable natural resource and Nebraska’s economy. 

I want to emphasize that I am not opposed to pipelines.  We already have hundreds of them in our state.  I am opposed to the proposed Keystone XL Pipeline route because it is directly over the Ogallala Aquifer.

Therefore, I am asking you to disapprove TransCanada’s pending permit request. Do not allow TransCanada to build a pipeline over the Ogallala Aquifer and risk the potential damage to Nebraska’s water.  Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

1 comment:

  1. Thank you for your words of wisdom. This pipeline cannot be permitted. You sum it up beautifully, "I want to emphasize that I am not opposed to pipelines. We already have hundreds of them in our state. I am opposed to the proposed Keystone XL Pipeline route because it is directly over the Ogallala Aquifer." AMEN! Well said!

    ReplyDelete

ShareThis