Thursday, December 16, 2010

Slate: If homosexuality is ok, why is incest wrong?

Here,  William Saletan busts one of the slippery-slope, going-to-hell-in-a-hand-basket arguments against gay marriage.

Writing in Slate yesterday about David Epstein, a Columbia University political scientist charged last week with third-degree incest for allegedly shagging his adult daughter, William Saletan noted:
...The stereotype among educated liberals: Homosexuality is urbane, polygamy is for Mormons, and incest is for hayseeds. So when David Epstein, a Columbia University political scientist, was charged last week with third-degree incest for allegedly shagging his adult daughter, the blogosphere erupted. Conservatives called it another sign of moral chaos...an inexorable descent from homosexuality to incest.

...Morally, the family-structure argument captures our central intuition about incest: It confuses relationships. Constitutionally, this argument provides a rational basis for laws against incest. But it doesn't provide a rational basis for laws against homosexuality. In fact, it supports the case for same-sex marriage.

When a young man falls in love with another man, no family is destroyed. Homosexuality is largely immutable, as the chronic failure of "ex-gay" ministries attests. So if you forbid sex between these two men, neither of them is likely to form a happy, faithful heterosexual family. The best way to help them form a stable family is to encourage them to marry each other...

Homosexuality is an orientation. Incest isn't. If the law bans gay sex, a lesbian can't have a sex life. But if you're hot for your sister, and the law says you can't sleep with her, you have billions of other options. Get out of your house, for God's sake...

No comments:

Post a Comment

ShareThis